Malta Maritime Law Association

Malta Maritime Law Association

Member of the Comité Maritime International

  • About MMLA
    • Committees
      • Subcommittees
    • Maritime History of Malta
  • News
  • Events
    • Past Events
    • Upcoming Events
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • Contact

Port notice 7/20 – Dispute Resolution and Procedures under S.L 545.30

May 22, 2020 Leave a Comment

The Ports and Yachting Directorate within Transport Malta has issued Port Notice Number 07/20 entitled ‘Dispute resolution and procedures in connection with bunkering operations’ in order to remind its recipients about the provisions of the Dispute Resolution (Procedures) Regulation under subsidiary legislation 545.30 of the laws of Malta.

The port notice highlighted the availability of an authorised provider and a customer to bring forth a complaint to the Regulator in order to settle a dispute between them. This comes as a timely reminder in a period where local Courts have been closed due to Covid-19 measures.

In accordance with the Port Notice, the regulation is applicable to bunkering operations where a dispute has arisen between the bunkering fuel operator and provider and the receiving vessel. The procedure provides for an alternative dispute resolution mechanism (ADR) that is intended to be swift, economical, transparent and simple. Much of its attraction lies in the fact that disputes between authorised providers are to be settled within 4 months while disputes between an authorised provider and a consumer must be settled within 90 days, with extensions are only allowed in exceptional circumstances. Complaints and supporting documentation may be filed with the Regulator online and subject to certain conditions, the decisions taken by the Regulator are binding on the parties to the dispute, with administrative fines imposed for non-compliance. This procedure is however entirely voluntary and is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism which does not affect the parties’ rights to proceed to arbitration or to court should they prefer.

More details are available below.

SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 545.30 – DISPUTE RESOLUTION (PROCEDURES) REGULATION

THE INVOLVED PARTIES:

Taking a closer look at the Regulation, the involved parties are as follows:

The Authorised Provider:

The Dispute Resolution (Procedures) Regulation is not limited to bunkering operations and defines an authorised provider as any natural or legal person whether privately or publicly owned, who has a valid authorisation to operate, provide or carry out any activity or operation or to provide any service relating to energy and energy and water services.

The Consumer:

The consumer means any person who uses or requests a service or product the provision of which is regulated by the Act who is acting for purposes which are outside his trade, business, craft or profession. This definition raises questions as to who can qualify as a consumer, however the Port Notice explains that this shall be applicable ‘for bunker operations where a dispute arises between the bunkering fuel operator and provider and the receiving vessel’.

The Regulator:

The Regulator, established under the Regulator For Energy and Water Services Act, is composed of a Chairman and not less than four and not more than six members. Members are appointed by the Minister for a term of 5-7 years and may be re-appointed only once.

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGULATOR

The Regulation provides for two scenarios, dispute resolution where the parties are both authorised providers and dispute resolution where the parties are an authorised provider and a customer. The Regulation seeks to provide authorised providers and consumers with an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that is intended to be simple and transparent, offering binding decisions delivered in a swift and economical manner.

Where a dispute arises between authorised providers, The Regulator must initiate an investigation into the dispute as soon as possible and must seek to resolve the dispute within 4 months from the date when the dispute was notified to it. This time frame may be extended by a further two months where additional information is sought and the parties agree to such an extension.

Under the Regulation, the Regulator has the power to initiate an investigation of its own initiative. The jurisdiction of the Regulator is however, not automatic, and the Regulator may refuse to initiate an investigation where it is satisfied that other means of resolving the dispute in a timely manner are available to the parties. It may also refuse to initiate an investigation where the dispute is already subject to legal proceedings. Where a decision has been taken to refuse to initiate an investigation the Regulator must inform the parties as soon as possible. However, if within 4 months from such a decision, the dispute has not been resolved or the party seeking redress has not initiated legal proceedings, the Regulator may, at the request of a party, initiate an investigation.

Subject to possible appeal, the Regulator’s decision shall be binding on the parties and failure to abide by the decision shall be considered an infringement of the Regulation, subject to an administrative fine.

Under the Regulation, the Regulator shall also have jurisdiction in cases where a consumer alleges that an authorised provider has made an infringement of the Regulator for Energy and Water Services Act or subsidiary legislation made thereunder. When referring a dispute, a consumer must show on a prima facie basis that it has been affected by an act or omission of the authorised provider. In resolving the dispute, the Regulator may amongst other directives, order the authorised provider to effect reimbursement of payments received or to make compensation payments. Such payments may include the whole or part of the costs relating to the engagement of a lawyer or technical adviser engaged in submitting the dispute. Should a party fail to abide by an order given, the Regulator may impose an administrative fine of not more than €600 for each day of non-compliance.

Interestingly, the Regulator is not a compulsory dispute settlement mechanism for disputes arising between authorised providers and consumers. In fact the provisions of the Regulation make clear that ‘the provisions of this Regulation shall be without prejudice to the right of a consumer to have recourse to any other body in resolving any such dispute’.

As many other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, the Regulator aims to be expeditious in its investigations, with the Regulation setting out a 90 day period within which disputes must be resolved. This time frame may only be extended in exceptional circumstances. The Regulator aims to increase efficiency by allowing complaints and supporting documentation to be submitted online. Official communication may also be made by electronic means or if applicable, by post.

When faced with a consumer complaint against an authorised provider, the Regulator may refuse to deal with complaint in the following circumstances:

  1. Where consumer did not first attempt to contact the authorised provider in order to discuss his complaint and seek to resolve the matter with the authorised provider directly.
  2. Where the dispute is frivolous or vexatious.
  3. Where the dispute is being or has been considered by another dispute resolution entity or by a Court.
  4. Where the Consumer did not submit the complaint to the Regulator within one year from the date upon which the consumer submitted the complaint to the authorised provider
  5. Where dealing with the dispute would serious impair the effective operation of the Regulator.
  6. Where the consumer has not submitted the complaint to the Regulator within 2 years from the date upon which the facts constituting the substance of the complaint have first arisen.

According to the Regulation, decisions are binding on the parties to the dispute. However, where the dispute is between an authorised provider and a consumer, it is only binding on consumer if has been informed of binding nature in advance and has specifically accepted this.

It is to be noted that though decisions are binding, they are not final and decisions taken by the Regulator are subject to appeal before the Administrative Review Tribunal within 20 days of the decision. Appeals may be filed on the following grounds:

(a) that a material error as to the facts has been made;

(b) that there was a material procedural error;

(c) that an error of law has been made;

(d) that there was some material illegality, including unreasonableness or lack of proportionality

CONCLUSION:

The Regulation aims to provide for an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that seeks to increase consumer protection, in a timely and cost effective manner. In times where Courts are closed due to COVID-19 containment measures, authorised providers and/or consumers looking for quick settlement of a dispute may consider this mechanism as a valid alternative. Nonetheless, it is advised that disputes involving complex legal issues should continue to be referred before a Court so that one may make full use of all the legal mechanisms available therein.

The full port notice can be accessed here.

By Dr Martina Farrugia, Fenech & Fenech Advocates

Source: Lexology

Filed Under: Latest, Malta, Malta Flag, Maltese law, Mediterranean maritime affairs

Maritime Malta – Legal Perspective

December 15, 2016 Leave a Comment

The term ‘Maritime Malta’ perfectly describes Malta – a country which has always had close connections with the sea and maritime sector. Malta’s position in the centre of the Mediterranean, equidistant from the straits of Gibraltar and Suez and the shores of North Africa and Italy, means that it has always been considered a highly strategic trading post.

Malta’s existing maritime diversity is evidenced by the fact that it:

  • has the largest shipping register in Europe; 
  • has one of the deepest natural harbours in the world;
  • is home to numerous marinas which now welcome some of the world’s most glamorous superyachts;
  • has a tradition in ship repair, with numerous yards and docks – one of which is 230 metres long;
  • has two fascinating ports of call, Valletta and Gozo, for the hundreds of cruise liners either visiting Malta or using it has a home port;
  • is equidistant from the straits of Gibraltar and Suez and thus an ideal bunkering location;
  • boasts an international port (Malta Freeport) which serves as a highly successful transhipment centre; and 
  • is home to the International Maritime Law Institute, a postgraduate academic institution under the auspices of the International Maritime Organisation.

These achievements are a direct result of careful planning, a strong workforce that is prepared to deliver value for money and a ‘can do’ attitude. In addition, Malta has a stable and reliable legal regime and laws which give investors and their financiers a high degree of confidence.

Overview of legal system

Before Malta became a British colony in 1801, it had a fully developed judicial system based initially on Roman law and later on the Napoleonic Code. When the British came to Malta, they found a highly developed legal system. That said, the years under British rule (from 1801 to 1964) were extremely important in terms of shipping legislation, as a number of shipping laws passed in England during this period came into force in Malta.

Following independence in 1964, a number of important commercial laws passed by Parliament were based on the British model. These include several laws in relation to financial services, shipping and companies. This, coupled with the fact that English is the second official language in Malta (which means that all legislation is available in English), ensures that investors and their financiers are guaranteed a high level of confidence. As English is an official language, there is often less bureaucracy compared to other jurisdictions, where everything from a simple power of attorney to the most complex corporate documents must be translated into the working language of the respective country, notarised and apostilled.

Malta has a diverse body of maritime laws to sustain its maritime activities. It is universally recognised that having a solid legal base which provides potential investors and their financiers with confidence that their investments are secure is paramount. Without it, no country can aspire to have good-quality, high-end investments.

In addition to the laws passed by Parliament, Malta is a signatory to an increasing number of international conventions regarding the maritime sector. Further, as Malta is a member of the European Union, it is subject to the entire body of European law.

International conventions

Malta is party to a number of both well-known and less-established international conventions, and these conventions are a major part of its body of law. The more well-known conventions include:

  • the Safety of Life at Sea Convention; 
  • the Prevention of Pollution from Ships Convention; and 
  • the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Malta helped to launch the discussion on the establishment of UNCLOS on November 1 1967 when Dr Arvid Pardo, Malta’s permanent representative to the United Nations, made a heartfelt appeal before the General Assembly highlighting the need to protect the oceans and take all measures against pollution. It was Pardo who, based on Malta’s historic position, argued that the seabed and ocean floor should constitute part of the “common heritage of mankind” – a phrase now contained in Article 136 of UNCLOS.

Local legislation

In terms of local legislation, there are several laws which regulate every aspect of the maritime sector. Perfect examples of Maltese maritime law are the Merchant Shipping Act (first promulgated in 1973) and the several pieces of subsidiary legislation promulgated under the act. The Merchant Shipping Act is the undisputed authority for the maritime sector. It regulates numerous pillars of maritime law, including:

  • the registration of vessels; 
  • the registration of mortgages; 
  • masters and seafarers; 
  • safety at sea; 
  • pollution; 
  • special shipping inquiries; 
  • wreck and salvage; and 
  • shipowner liability.

Many other legal notices and subsidiary legislation have been promulgated under the auspices of the act. Combined, these laws establish the entire body of law regulating, among other things:

  • collisions at sea; 
  • training and certifications; 
  • load line rules; 
  • the limitation of liability on maritime claims; 
  • safe manning and watch keeping; 
  • shipping organisations; and 
  • the certification of commercial yachts.

The Merchant Shipping Act has been fine-tuned and constantly updated to the extent that the Malta flag is now the European white-listed flag of choice for hundreds of shipowners. The reasons behind the flag’s success are mostly operational in nature and include:

  • English being an official language; 
  • the tonnage tax regime; and 
  • the regulator’s ability to offer a continuous service, where necessary.

Further, as Maltese law offers a great deal of protection to financiers, it is attractive to investors. Ships are often financed by third parties. The mortgagee must believe that the law of the flag state properly protects its interests; otherwise, the financier will refuse the owner’s chosen flag. As such, the choice of flag is an important consideration.

Maltese law also protects mortgagees against defaulting owners – one of the reasons why the Maltese flag is so successful. Further, under Maltese law, mortgagees are in a privileged position because the mortgage itself constitutes an executive title. This means that the mortgage is equivalent to a judgment. Thus, in the case of a defaulting owner, the mortgagee need not commence an action on the merits against the mortgagor for defaulting on its payments. Any other normal creditor would have to commence an action, make a case in court, obtain a judgment and then enforce the judgment.

Under Maltese law, mortgagees have a number of available options to enforce their rights:

  • Take possession of the vessel – under this method, the mortgagee can trade the vessel as though it has ownership while the vessel remains under the ownership of the defaulting owner. 
  • Private sale – under a private sale, the vessel is sold with all its privileged debts and thus will be an unattractive proposition to potential purchasers. 
  • Judicial sale – a judicial sale is one ordered by the courts. Once a date is set for the auction, the vessel will be sold to the highest bidder. In a judicial sale, the vessel is sold free and unencumbered (thus shedding all of its previous debts); however, as there is no reserve price, vessels are commonly sold for a fraction of their actual price. 
  • Court-approved private sale – a court-approved sale allows a mortgagee to find a private buyer and negotiate a price, thus eliminating the uncertainty of the sale price. To do so, the mortgagee must file an application in court requesting approval of the sale and present two independent valuations of the ship to show that the sale price is equal to or in excess of the valuation. Once the sale is approved, the vessel will be sold free and unencumbered. This method ensures that the vessel will be sold for an agreed price, rather than leaving it to chance in a judicial sale – something which is particularly useful in the depressed, second-hand tonnage market. This way, all the parties involved – including the shipowner – get the benefits of both a private sale and judicial sale without the disadvantages.

Comment

One of the secrets behind Malta’s success in the international maritime industry is the country’s willingness to think outside the box, improve its products, develop new solutions and update its laws to ensure that they meet the needs and requirements of the international maritime community. For example, Maltese law has continued to develop robust structures to assist superyacht owners, distinguishing them from cargo vessels and passenger liners (for further details please see “Malta – logical choice for superyacht owners“).

To be successful, a country’s maritime law must reflect the needs of the community: it must be sensitive to the needs of users and regulators and should thus be continuously updated. Malta’s regulator and legislature work with industry service providers to ensure that Maltese law reflects the exigencies of the maritime industry. In this context, the Malta Maritime Law Association (MMLA) has become important in developing the concept of ‘Maritime Malta’. The MMLA comprises maritime lawyers and other service providers and has an excellent working relationship with Transport Malta. The MMLA is a member of the Committee Maritime International (CMI), the body tasked with drafting maritime conventions. In 2015 Malta had its first representative elected to the CMI executive committee.

Contributed by Dr. Ann Fenech, Fenech & Fenech Advocates

Source: International Law Office, 30 November 2016

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: International Law News, Latest, Malta, Malta Flag, Maritime Registration, Mediterranean maritime affairs

Saving Lives of Refugees at Sea

May 13, 2014 Leave a Comment

Article, Times of Malta, 13 May, 2014.

Seminar organised by the European Maritime Law Organisation and the Malta Maritime Law Association.
See full article in pdf.

Filed Under: EU, Events, International News, Malta, Mediterranean maritime affairs

The Malta Flag: a 40-year Success Story

August 18, 2012 Leave a Comment

By: Dr Jotham Scerri Diacono and Dr Karl Grech Orr Ganado & Associates, Advocates.


Malta’s efforts to establish itself internationally as a centre of excellence are reaping success. The islands’ financial services sectors – and this will include insurance, gaming and investment services – are flourishing, having had the benefit of a political decision taken some years back for the islands to develop in this direction. The maritime services sector, on the other hand, preceded the financial services sector: a long maritime tradition, quite evident from the islands’ colourful history, coupled with a foremost reputation and modern facilities, has placed Malta at the forefront of maritime nations worldwide….

Full article in pdf: The Malta Flag: a 40-year Success Story

Filed Under: Malta, Malta Flag, Maritime Registration, Mediterranean maritime affairs

Arresting a vessel in Maltese waters is now even easier

June 1, 2011 Leave a Comment

Recent legislative changes ratified by Malta streamline the process for arresting a vessels, write Dr Karl Grech Orr and Dr Matthew Attard.

Article appeared in Tanker Shipping & Trade, June-July 2011. See full article here.

Filed Under: International News, Malta, Mediterranean maritime affairs

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

News & Publications

  • MMLA President at Malta Maritime Summit October 18, 2024
  • MMLA lecturers at ELSA Malta Maritime Summer Law School August 29, 2024
  • MMLA President at 2nd UN Convention IEJSS Signing Ceremony June 20, 2024
  • MMLA at IMO IMLI Conference June 20, 2024
  • Case Law Update Seminar – Call for Contributions May 3, 2024
  • AIJA seminar “Setting sails in turbulent times” in Valletta, Malta from 13 to 15 June 2024 April 29, 2024

Contact Us

Malta Maritime Law Association (MMLA)
Sa Maison House
Sa Maison Hill
Floriana FRN 1612
MALTA
E: mmla@mmla.org.mt
T: (+356) 25 594 118
follow us on facebook and linkedIn

Join Us

Even though the MMLA is a law association, membership is open to all those with a real interest in maritime affairs with a legal twist.
Become a member...

International Events

The CMI Assembly and Colloquium 2024 was held between 22-24 May in Gothenburg, Sweden. More information can be found here

The CMI Colloquium 2023 took place in Montreal, Canada from 14-16 June. More information can be found here

The 2022 CMI Conference took place in Antwerp, Belgium from 18-21 October when the Comite’ Maritime International celebrated its 125th anniversary. Find out more…

The CMI Assembly and Colloquium was held in Mexico City between 30 September – 2 October 2019: Find out more…

The CMI held the Assembly meeting and other events on 8./9. November 2018 in London. Find out more…

The Malta Colloquium on Judicial Sales was held on 27 February 2018 in Valletta. Find out more…

 

 

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in